To understand the background to
family constellation work, we have to open ourselves
up to the idea that within any family or group
there is a common soul at work, a family or group
soul.
I shall try to give a picture of the function
such a group soul must have had in the past, and
still has today. I shall also say something about
the 'orders' (laws) that this could bring into
being. I have an image. My aim is not necessarily
to look for historical accuracy or to prove something.
Rather, I want to enable people to take action
towards change. My concern is to widen our understanding
of the role of conscience and those inexplicable
impulses that often turn out to be tragic. This
should open the way to help us to resolve tragic
entanglements, or even to avoid them in the first
place.
The original grouping of peoples was in tribes
of approximately twenty to thirty members. They
were highly interdependent and it was impossible
for any individual to leave the group, whatever
the situation. Likewise, it was unimaginable that
anyone could be excluded from this kinship, with
the possible exception of someone murdering another
member of the group. An echo of this is to be
found in the story of Cain and Abel.
The Right to
Belong
In such a group there were two fundamental
'orders'. The first 'order' was that every member
had an equal right to belong to the group. It
was unthinkable for any member to deny this right
to another member. By the same token, each member
would have known that the well being of the group
had priority over his, or her, own personal needs.
Within a nomadic group the old and the sick would
inevitably remain behind and be abandoned as soon
as they became a burden to the group. They were
prepared to die and nobody would have stood in
their way because of a personal attachment.
A story once told to me by a medical doctor confirmed
that something similar to this still exists today.
He was working in a hospital in Tanzania. One
day some men from the Massai tribe brought in
a young man on a stretcher. He had an injured
leg. When the chief medical officer examined him
he realized that the gangrene in his leg was so
advanced that the leg could not be saved. He called
the men and informed them that it had to be amputated
or the young man would die. The men said that
they needed to consult with each other first.
After an hour they returned and announced: "We
have decided that he must die."
For the same reason, weak and disabled children
were left behind and abandoned in nomadic groups.
Here again, the survival of the group had precedence
over any compassion for an individual. Was this
cruel? No, they knew their limits and they consented
to them. Here we see that the right to belong
in the group was limited and had to be weighed
against the well being of the group as a whole.
Everything was orientated toward the survival
and continuation of the group.
The Rank Order of Precedence
The second 'order' in such a group guaranteed
precedence to earlier or older members over those
who came later, or were younger. In this way,
everyone in the group had his, or her, place in
the system. In the course of time, an individual
progressed quite naturally from a lower to a higher
position within the hierarchy and thus there were
no conflicts over ranking in the group.
The Collective Conscience
These two 'orders' - the equal right
to belong, and the precedence of earlier or older
members - did not emerge out of any rational consideration.
They were predetermined for the group through
a "collective conscience". Any transgression
against these 'orders' would result in a bad conscience
and the ensuing feeling of guilt would ensure
that an individual returned to an appropriate
respect for the 'orders'. We can also call it
a "group conscience" or a "family
conscience", and it is different from the
"personal conscience" that I shall be
discussing shortly. In contemporary society, this
family conscience has become largely unconscious,
but in pre-historic times, in a tribal group,
it must have been conscious, at least in so far
as it caused feelings of guilt in its members
if the 'orders' were transgressed, and feelings
of innocence once the wrongdoing was recognized
and atoned for.
The Personal Conscience
As bartering and trade developed
between small tribal groups, so the concept of
"us" and "them" developed,
as well as the sense of "belonging"
or "not belonging". Subsequently, this
led to a differentiation between "good"
and "bad", or "better than"
and "less good than". At a later stage
such differentiations also occurred within the
group with assertions like: "I am better
than you", or "I have more right than
you to belong". So alongside the "collective
conscience" and its attendant feelings of
guilt and innocence, there developed a "personal
conscience" that was guided by moral imperatives
of good and bad. This personal conscience led
to a process of individuation and an individual
consciousness as different members within the
group held different values from each other. Thereafter
there developed a polarization between the individual
and the group, and between individual freedom
and the norms and expectations of the group.
In the course of this development, the norms and
laws relating to the collective conscience were
now pushed into the realm of the unconscious and
they would no longer be expressed directly. In
the same way, as individual experience became
more important than the needs of the group, so
personal conscience took over much of the place
previously occupied by the collective conscience.
This went so far, that individuals interpreted
the voice of the personal conscience as the voice
of God giving them the right to set themselves
up against the group norms. This marked the culmination
of the separation of the individual from the group
and its collective conscience.
However, this collective conscience must not
be forgotten. In fact, it cannot be ignored because
it is the basis of all human co-existence, and
will always be so. No matter how wide a tree can
spread its trunk and branches, without its roots,
it will die. In terms of human relationships,
this does not mean that we must doubt the value
of the role of personal conscience. It does mean,
however, that we need to become aware of our roots
again, and allow ourselves to be carried, nourished
and limited by them.
Family Constellations
What does all this mean for family constellation?
In family constellations the different ways in
which personal conscience and collective conscience
take effect, are revealed and experienced. The
frightening and dangerous consequences of the
repression and denial of the collective conscience
can be brought to light. This is where, despite
our best intentions, failure occurs in terms of
life threatening illnesses, grave accidents, criminality
and suicide. All these symptoms point towards
an ignorance of and transgression of the 'orders'
of the collective conscience. At the same time
they also give an insight into how these entanglements
might be resolved, diminished, or possibly avoided
in the future.
In constellations we can often see how the personal
conscience unknowingly taps into the 'orders'
of collective conscience, with negative consequences.
So for example, in these sentences said by a child
to a parent: "I follow you", or "I
do it in your place", or "I sacrifice
myself for you", we can recognize the underlying
impulse of the collective conscience that the
interest of the 'whole' has priority over the
personal wishes of the individual. However, while
adhering to one of the orders of the collective
conscience, it transgresses the order of rank
or precedence. In the collective conscience the
young cannot take over a responsibility from an
elder, but the personal conscience has no regard
for 'prior' where precedence is given to those
who come first. Here we see how the collective
conscience, operating at an unconscious level,
defeats any attempt made by someone to put themselves
in the place of another, even though their effort
may be in line with their individual personal
conscience.
Family constellations give us an insight into
what lies behind many tragic fates and they allow
for the possibility of beneficial change for all
of us. The work honors the demands of the collective
conscience and brings them back into our awareness
again, without compromising the individual gains
made through the personal conscience. It connects
the two consciences at a higher level, at the
level of what we might call the "conscience
of the greater soul". If this is achieved,
then an individual can consent to the underlying
'orders' of the collective conscience, but at
the same time can go beyond these limitations.
In the service of this greater something, it is
possible to keep intact that which belongs to
our human evolution, and at the same time to grow
as individuals and to find maximum personal fulfillment.
